Time, Intelligence Process & Outstanding Performance

Introduction

Logic: Knowledge and experiences from the past. A problem appears when knowledge and experiences are not sufficient.

Intelligence: A process of mind that results to the new – unknown until that moment - substantial information; the information that leads to transcendence with perspective. Intelligence is related to what we call inspiration, insight, foresight.

Intelligence evolution is strictly related to the ability to perceive the new, unknown and substantial information. When we are referred to that, previously unknown, information, it is important to clarify that it does not concern a fixed information related to one or another fact. It is a constant flow in progress that produces information related to events, to the transcendence of problems or to the discovery of the new and substantial. This flow of information, which we will examine later on, is related to the Intelligence Process and to our Intelligence Evolution. It is not knowledge and experiences that resolve problems or effectively manage opportunities. The problem appears because knowledge and experience are not sufficient. If our knowledge and experiences were sufficient enough to resolve the problem, then it wouldn’t exist. The new unknown and substantial information that leads us to problem solving or to the effective management of a situation does not occur from our knowledge and experiences but from another perception, through a life attitude. This perception is not related to learning (knowledge and experiences). It is something beyond all that, it is a spontaneous life attitude and it constitutes the most essential factor for our Intelligence evolution.

The comprehension of the Intelligence Process means a spontaneous ability to distinguish the limits of Logic, its limited capabilities and the conditions that make the new, unknown and substantial information perceivable in our life.

The basics for our Intelligence Evolution in Practice

The perception of the effect that the basic Principles have –individually, combined and simultaneously, of all of the Principles– on facts and situations is absolutely related to cognitive evolution, to the continuous improvement of the quality of action, inspiration, creativity; it is related with the way we discover the new and substantial. By uniting, combining and correlating information that derive from the perception of the relation of the Principles to facts and situations, the new and substantial occurs, the quality of the action is improving, discoveries and inventions are made.
What in many cases blinds all human beings and indeed largely with vast consequences, is habit, tradition and emotion, in other words, much of prior knowledge and experiences.
The two following figures illustrate in a simple way:

Τhe conditions for Intelligence Evolution and
Τhe reasons for mind disorganization

Anyone can easily realize the reliability of the theories:

1. All major discoveries over the centuries – with their enormous contribution to our Intelligence Evolution - are related to the conscious or even the unconscious perception of the relation of Principles to events (first figure).

2. Furthermore, those who will personally investigate whether the two above figures are valid concerning events, situations and developments – in practice – they will constantly discover that both are absolutely related to reality.

Learn More

Problem and Opportunity (Innovation or Discovery) are directly related to the New, Unknown and Substantial Information.

Emotions arise from the collaboration of the senses with the nervous system, the brain, in synergy and coordination with certain other organs as well. What is perceived by the senses is converted to a production of various chemical substances, such as adrenaline, serotonin, cortisol and others. These substances, subsequently, create emotions and regulate behavior. Therefore, emotions function as a process of expanding perception and of responding to various events and situations, always in combination with the senses. The senses perceive a small fraction of reality. For example, our eyes see less than one centimeter to ten meters of the electromagnetic spectrum . The same applies –in a larger extent– as we attempt to perceive facts and situations through emotions. The capacity to perceive reality through emotion is much more limited than that of the senses. Nevertheless, senses and emotions for thousands of years are the basic factors for knowledge and action.

The way Human mind functions.

The majority of people do not wonder about how emotion was created, why it exists, what it can offer and why it prevents the evolution of mind and the improvement of the quality of action. Human beings’ mind is so mechanical that it responds automatically, hastening to meet every need that it considers important, because the mass desires its fulfillment. Moreover, it is on such a condition that the clientism oriented system of desire fulfillment and creation of new is based, that it never evaluates over time the prospect of needs that it is fulfilling. Its primary concern is to generate needs and then attempts to fulfill desires. There are intense desires to a large extend –what the mass wants– in order to meet emotional and practical needs through an entirely anthropocentric approach. An approach that is not taking into account the perspective and value of the desire and need, its broader impact, not only environmentally, but also on the very cognitive constitution of human beings, on limiting their ability of becoming more and more free, on becoming more and more effective in action, to act with inspiration, to discover the new and essential that conduces to problem solving and constant evolution. The importance is weighted to the extent of desire and not to the perspective of the effect of that considered important and sought to be fulfilled. They perceive everything through need and desire, namely, through emotion; they are unaware of the vicious circle into which they are led when struggling to meet their emotional needs due to habit, especially when these needs are intense and extensive. It is precisely then when they are not at all concerned with the prospect of their needs and desires. We consume an incredible amount of time and spent countless money on activities related to our emotional dependence, which resembles a drug that we refer to as emotional needs’ fulfillment and mental balance. We do not comprehend that it is essentially the balance of our Intelligence, namely, the continuous expansion of perception and Intelligence evolution that is constantly improving the quality of action. We do not perceive in practice the minimal basics that cause the evolution of mind as well as those that cause Cognitive disarray and disorder, which we refer to as mental and emotional disorder. Man does not seem to understand that emotions are responsible for restricting the development of mind, leading to conflict and manipulation, restriction and inability to evolve. He is not aware that Intelligence evolution has nothing, whatsoever, to do with emotion and that it primarily depends on the perception of the new –up until now unknown– reliable and substantial information, which is limitless and constantly improves the quality of action. He does not realize that stagnation, repetition and problematic action, in other words, Cognitive disarray and disorder of mind, are directly related to the perception of facts and situations based on prior knowledge and experiences, which include emotion. What he is in fact unable to perceive is that the constituents of Identity/ Personality (knowledge, experiences and emotions) are limiting Intelligence evolution, while strengthening the dominance of emotions. He is mainly concerned with the strengthening and validity of Identity –which has to do with repetition and affirmation– rather than the evolution of mind that is not associated with Identity and its reassurance, but with constant evolution, which may include annulment, cancellation of significant beliefs, knowledge, points of view.

The transcendence of limitations caused by the Senses and Emotions.

It is obvious that we are not able to live without senses and emotion. However, we can perceive the limitations imposed on our Intelligence evolution and the improvement of the quality of action by senses and emotion. In addition, we are able to perceive how to overcome the limitations caused by them. It is something that we do since the creation of mankind, without being aware of it; we have yet to realize how valuable this is. It is a process that occurs unforced and spontaneously, requiring no effort, such as education, cultivation. Our Intelligence evolution depends entirely on the perception of the relationship of the stable and unchanging over time information –which we refer to as Principles– which affects matter and energy by regulating the developments in every field. The flow of developments in whole from the subatomic (photons) to the atomic (chemical elements), then to the molecular (inorganic and organic compounds), subsequently to the biological (living things) and, finally, to the social field of evolution (relations), takes place through these constant and unchanged information, the basic Principles.

The way to our Intelligence Evolution in Practice.

What in many cases blinds all human beings and indeed largely with vast consequences, is habit, tradition and emotion, in other words, much of prior knowledge and experiences. An Example: everyone agrees that the Principle of Continuous Alteration is always and everywhere applied; that everything related to matter and energy –therefore, man himself– are constantly changing and that these changes are not unregulated and random, but determined by Principles. Moreover, even though everyone agrees that this is always the way things happen, subsequently, nobody answers why we do not perceive the alterations associated with humans based on a number of principles. Eventually, people become arbitrary and unreasonable –they disregard what they agreed upon as always and everywhere applied and valid– because of their desire (emotion) to exist after death, as they wish and as tradition has established. Consequently, they make completely unreliable assumptions, they act through fantasy and fanciful about souls, reincarnation, religious beliefs, ideologies and various other. It is exactly this way of perception that divides them, resulting inevitably in conflict. In essence, the above findings about our Intelligence evolution pertain to the transcendence of knowledge, experience and personal points of view that for thousands of years human beings have accumulated in memory and in the chromosomes through the senses and emotions. At any rate, human beings have yet to realize the incredible results of these discoveries. Hundreds of years shall pass, maybe thousands, for noteworthy results concerning the improvement of consciousness of those leading to Intelligence evolution and to the continuous improvement of the quality of action, to become evident. Gradually, for an increasing number of people will be easier to perceive in practice how the new, reliable and substantial occurs and acts, completing, altering and removing old information in memory or wherever it lies. Less

The New, Unknown and Essential Information is the ultimate guide.

Through lifetime, new, unknown and essential information appears without the participation of the senses and emotions (inconscient) and without the participation of previous knowledge and experiences (unconsciously, which means, without knowledge and experiences that constitute conscience).

Learn More

While it seems that previous knowledge and experience are responsible for discovering new substantial information, this is not what actually happens. There are many people who possess the same knowledge and experience but a few discover essential gaps in them and even fewer who result in the perception of the new, unknown until that moment, information which gives credible answers to cognitive gaps. We do not perceive the world only through senses and emotions, knowledge and experience. There is substantial information that becomes perceivable through ways out and beyond all that. Such a fact appears in everyone; but there are huge differences concerning frequency, depth and intensity. This perception occurs for everyone through an inconsient and unconscious flow of information from Principles to events. Depending on the degree that the (specific) flow of information becomes conscious, the abilities of perceiving the new, unknown and essential information as well as the abilities of connecting that information with the already existing, exponentially multiply. The pace of our Intelligence evolution depends on the consciousness we develop regarding this flow of information. The New, Unknown and Substantial Information, from the time it is defined and confirmed for its validity is what we depend on in order to reexamine any previous equivalent, relative or vaguely relevant to this, information. This signifies that we are not attempting to consciously or unconsciously adapt the new to what we already are acquainted with. The new, credible, unknown until that moment data leads us every time regarding the perception of the old information. The New, Unknown and Essential Information is the ultimate guide, is the beginning and end of our Intelligence evolution. Usually, and mostly without realizing it, we attempt to comprehend the new based on our up to now knowledge and experiences. This decreases or annuls the potential for the discovery of new essential information; it interrupts our Intelligence evolution. The existing knowledge and experiences inhibit our Intelligence evolution Less

Basic Principles and Daily Life.

What is usual and quite reasonable in working relationships is for the employer and the Administration to primarily aim at maximizing the efficiency. In particular, they seek to reap the maximum benefit of their relationship with the employees. What is more, the employee from his side seeks to protect himself –as a person and collectively– from what he calls exploitation without limits.

Through this way of understanding an intensely emotional relationship is developed. The main emotions that the employer and the administration attempt to impose – openly or covertly – in the working environment are those of power and imposition. On the other hand, the employee perceives facts and situations, mainly through fear, insecurity, trying to hide, to repeat properly, always according to the instructions, not to suffer any consequences and other similar effects.

Learn More

Following the above, most people will argue that this is considered natural, that it lies in the nature of human beings. For the most part, they have never wondered how consciousness is constantly widening in practice. They cannot, or rather do not want to see the large differences concerning the constitution of mind and the quality of action between individuals, groups, social organizations, countries, etc. They do not care, all the more so, how the alteration of the Intelligence status and the constant improvement of the quality of action, occur in practice. They are only concerned with repeating their experience, keeping committed to numbers, to indicators and efficiency, executing commands or whatever it is that they have been taught, and never seeking the understanding of the relation of basic Principles to facts, situations and their contribution to the continuous improvement of action. Consider whether personally or, even better, collectively, your attempt to understand the basic Principles, their relation to various facts and situations of the working environment and generally in a different way, on the basis of Union and not divisively, separating one another. We will attempt to describe what it means concurrent (United) understanding of the basic Principles, with regard to the previously mentioned example about working relations. The understanding of the relation of the Principle of Continuous Alteration together with the Principle of Least Action –which in the social field are perceived through the concepts of Love for Creation, Observation, and Consciousness on the basis of Principles and Constant Improvement– leads us to completely different ways of perceiving and acting. To begin with, no one questions the Principle of Continuous Alteration. Everything changes over time, not randomly and unregulated, but owing to the effect of Principles which create Rules/ Axioms/ Values and lead to the perception of Properties/ Characteristics/ Skills. Additionally, neither the Principle of Least Action, applied across the universe, may be questioned. Those having basic knowledge of physics are quite aware of this. That being the case, it should be understood that in the social sphere we name the Principle of Least action with words such as synergy and conflict avoidance, reduction of energy consumption in order to produce the same event, productivity or even competitiveness. All these words provide us with parts of the effect of the Principle of Least Action on the social sphere. Consequently, the following two questions arise:  How many of the employers, of those who administrate and of those who are employed comprehend –as they act– that that we admit is always in force, should be understood and that we should investigate whether it applies in daily life, in the action taking place throughout business and generally in life?  How many of the employers, of those who administrate and of those who are employed attempt to act through the understanding of the relation between facts and the basic Principles? Let us try to perceive what would happen if this particular way of understanding was applied. In other words, if we attempted to understand the various facts, the situations and the developments in the light of the basic Principles and not isolating them or interpreting them on the basis of interest and emotion. The employer and the administration –if they had actually understood what theoretically they admit to be always in force, the basic Principles– would have the best possible perception of the fact that constant change and the improvement in productivity (Principle of Least Action) should be achieved without emotion, because emotion multiplies reaction, conflicts (overt and covert), reduces the mind’s capacity for evolution, affecting negatively the continuous improvement of the quality of action. Emotion keeps us all –employers, those who administrate, employees, and generally everyone who is acting either collectively or individually– away from peacefulness, clarity of mind, perceiving the new and substantial, from inspiration, creativity, and the capacity to perceive the developments in perspective. Emotion implies repetition, in other words, effort to repeat what is considered desirable, as was conditioned from the past, and avoid what is regarded as negative and unpleasant.

Less

The Primary Basis of Thought

The basis of thought that does not differentiate the fields of evolution – the ones perceived as conceptual fields – and functions effectively and reliably within every field of evolution, connecting them together, offers an increased ability of perception and action of quality and perspective. We obviously, unconsciously, use various individual basis of thought for practical reasons or even problematic thoughts emotionally. However if the primary basis of thought is reliable, all individual thoughts are evaluated very simply and easily . This is actually the reason why we are writing the series of books and work on the development of the IPC-Net. Network. Concerning the evaluation of the primary basis of thought we are suggesting – which constitutes a simple and easy way, common to any conceptual field, to reliably evaluate the events. – by mentioning examples connected to our lives and daily actions, we frequently point out that its credibility may be determined only by testing it in practice.

Learn More

The primary Basis of Thought is able to pinpoint the main causes that lead us to the inability to specify the substantial, those that lead us to act for the management of the secondary and meaningless which results to the aimless waste of resources. It is able to easily pinpoint all those causes that lead us to the unnecessary, the pointless and the harmful in every cognitive field, hence in the social field. This has nothing to do with the engagement with details, product or service, but it concerns the perception of the essential causes which lead us towards the deviation from the substantial that is no other than the Intelligence disorganization and the inability to link the specific with the general, with the possible. It is a spontaneous and unconscious act of our mind related to the inability of perceiving our attempt to make the specific autonomous and dominant by ignoring its relation to the general. The creation of the unnecessary, pointless and harmful occurs in all fields of science, in financial activities but generally in all activities managed by humans individually or collectively. Any morpheme, economic, political, scientific or social in general, wishes to be multiplied in any possible way, without considering the degree of its offer and the need to exist –at any extent - and to continue to grow. Something similar is observed everywhere; in the western societies the unnecessary and pointless uses enormous amounts of energy in Education, Health, Production, in various services of the Public and Private Sector, almost everywhere. The tendency for reproduction and multiplication, prevails over reciprocity, by creating inexcusable costs, violating the Principle of Least Action and creating the well known “bubbles” in the economy and social structures that collapse and cause mass problems in societies and nations. We refer simple examples in order for the concept of the basis of thought to be perceived in practice. The examples concern individual and broader basis of thought, until we are led to the example concerning the one – the primary Basis of Thought – by which we are all able to simply, reliably and quickly evaluate thoughts concerning events and situations, whatever their origin might be; we are able to distinguish the perspective of thought concerning any event, if from its start and through its development we are able to perceive and manage effectively the developments that concern it with quality and perspective. a) We see the red, green, and blue color and we can all say which color it is exactly, unless we are color-blind. We have a basis of thought which is the result of a cooperation between the eyes, the nervous system and the brain for the relatively simple intelligence process of identifying colors. b) Someone throws an object from the roof of an block of flats and we all know that it will end up down on the street or an open area. Unless someone is insane. Then he claims various things, anything absurd that comes to his mind and no one pays any attention to him. The basis of thought in that specific case is the unconscious perception of the Principle of Gravity. This basis of thought not only leads us to a universal common agreement but also to a credible interpretation and action, if needed. It is known that we do not jump from the roofs of block of flats or from cliffs and edges. On the contrary, when the basis of thought is the emotion, we individually or collectively disagree and collide or we may massively agree about something, which though inhibits our intelligence development; for example, the mass ideological delusions that lead to collisions of great extent for centuries. When these delusions were dominant many considered them as being absolutely correct. At present, many of those ideological positions of the past seem to be insufficient or are even considered ludicrous. We wonder why we killed each other while we are ready to kill or be killed at a great extent for other similar ideological perceptions of the present. With the emotion, even if we do agree, comes the mass delusion related to the desire of repetition of the pleasant or the avoidance and hence of the non-knowledge and non-effective management of what we name unpleasant. It is essentially a delusion that leads to inability of evolution and to the opposition to the Principle of Continuous Change – everything that concerns matter and energy are altered in time- with which we all agree that it always is doubtlessly in effect. So we can clearly see that emotion unconsciously leads us contrary to the obvious - which always and without exception occurs – that is to say to the Principles. In many occasions actually, emotion prevails in practice. c) Oxygen and hydrogen are compounded under certain circumstances or other chemical components (affect) and combinations and those who know the Principles and relative Rules of Chemistry along with the Properties of chemical elements and combinations perceive the results of the evolution. They have developed a specified basis of thought in the cognitive field of Chemistry, they communicate, agree and give results in practice. In this specific circumstances there is, in a great degree, a conscious development of the specified basis of thought related to Chemistry. By this specified basis we comprehend and encounter with credibility events and developments in the specified region, by acquiring abilities for effective action concerning only the area of Chemistry. Those who are not aware of the specific basis of thought, when confronting relative events, either say nothing or pretend to know, resembling with doctors of an ancient tribe without however bringing any result. We claim that the primary basis of thought, that constitutes the beginning so much for the evaluation of any event and the correct relation to it as for the perception of its essence and credible action – if and when it is needed – in any stage of its development the event might be at and with any other it is related to, concerns only two simple facts which require constant perception in practice: a) Identity – which includes emotion- is a factor of repetition and Intelligence disorganization and b) The perception of the relation of the Principles with events provides reliable information which support The Intelligence evolution that leads us to constant improvement of the quality and perspective of actions. THESE TWO ARE THE PRIMARY BASIS OF THOUGHT. We mention and repeat in many sections of our books various examples from all cognitive fields related to the specific basis of thought. We could mention thousands or endless examples. But this will not lead to developments, to substantial results. Only the trial by each one individually in action may bring about something substantial, examining simultaneously the degree of credibility of our allegation concerning the Primary Basis of Thought. The Primary Basis of Thought gradually leads us to the effortless and spontaneous perception of: 1. Τhe results of faith and obsession to Identity which includes repetition and emotional perception of events and situations of any origin, form and nature. 2. Through it we are able to perceive emotions and their effects – especially the hidden emotions behind phrases like: «I don’t have enough time», «this is how the things are», «I have or you have or we have a duty to…», «this is how we always do it», «tradition is what we mainly rely on», «I was seriously thinking of the event… worrying about…» as well as behind so many other similar or even completely different transmission of messages through sentences. 3. To perceive in practice how and why new, reliable and substantial information occurs in an endless degree and in every cognitive field – without the social cognitive field being excluded. It is this information that constantly improves the quality and perspective of action. We increasingly easier perceive why this new information occurs through the relation of basic Principles to events and from the flow of information from the Principles to the Values/Rules/Axioms. We comprehend why and how with this informational system we are led to the reliable perception of Properties/Dexterities/Attributes concerning individuals, events and situations and in acting with quality and perspective due to reliable perception. The above are useful when tested in practice. Otherwise they are useless theories. Less

What Values and Principles are

Principles are the constant unchanged by time information. It is information that defines the alterations in matter and energy in what we perceive as time and space. For instance, the speed of light is constant and unchanged information and is not affected by space and time, matter or energy. On contraire, it is what alters the facts concerning what we perceive as space and as time; it also alters the facts of matter and energy, without their being able to affect the specific information.

Learn More

The basic Principles are common for every conceptual field, whether they belong to the field of the formal sciences or the theoretical studies. We, without having realized it, attribute various names to them, when they induce the exact same results to every conceptual field. For instance, the Principle of Least Action in Physics has the same results as the principles of Union (Love for creation), of Observation and Consciousness (Awareness- Comprehension) relating to the social conceptual field. In both cases these Principles define a least amount of energy needed for an event to occur, whether in nature or a social event (human relations). The observation and the comprehension are the basic principles of the public field for the creation, the retention and the improvement of the quality of relationships; they come to realize the new information that causes the stability and the development of the relationships. According also the observation and the comprehension, there is little consumption of energy through time, in order the relationship to hold out and develop. When the observation and the comprehension are missing, the relationships either are not created or, if exist, they fall apart due to lack of interest and due to tensions and collisions. When we relate Principles to Ethics, we limit the perception of the new and substantial information in a great degree and create distortions. Ethics is perceived as a sum of rules that mostly serve social organization having as a result some differentiations from place to place and time to time. It is easy to hide personal or collective interests behind ethics. Ethics and Logic are directly related. They do not provide a commonly acceptable framework of perception; they create divisions and conflicts, while Principles are constant through time, unchangeable and commonly accepted. By relating the Principles to Ethics we limit our perceptions concerning the new and substantial information that may occur through the comprehension of its effect. The Principles present the new and substantial information and therefore the perception concerning the truth of events. This signifies that the events are perceived or evoked having constancy and evolution perspective (truth) when they are related to the Principles. Principle in Greek means the start; it is the Basis which is constant (not changing). The event that is connected with Principles can have viability and perspective. The Principles are not a close, one-tracked relation of Cause - Causation with the events. There is a constant ability for their comprehension; an infinite volume of new substantial information may occur from the perception of the relation of Principles to the events. Values – Rules - Axioms. They constitute the intermediate in a wholesome perception of the flow of information from the Principles towards the events. They exist between the Principles and the Properties – Dexterities-Attributes. (See Appendix Ι: Principles, Values & Qualifications Map IPC-Net). It is information that occurs from the comprehension of the principles and their effect on matter and energy (events). In several cases they are perceived through observation of the Properties-Attributes of a multitude of identical or similar events. In any case, though a perception of Values – Rules - Axioms which begins from the Properties-Attributes of events must be confirmed through Principles; in other words their compliance to the specific Principles confirmed by the credibility of Rules - Axioms must be observed. For instance the Principle of Least Action in Physics, which is identical to the Principles (Laws) of Newton concerning motion, defines the rules relevant to the motion of the various materials. Afterwards, the Principles and the Rules – Axioms define the properties – Characteristics, such as the curved (parabolic) trajectory of a thrown object on Earth and generally where there is gravity. Respectively in the social conceptual field the Principles of Union (Love for Creation), of Observation and of Consciousness (Awareness - Comprehension) combined with the Rules-Values of Trust, Mutual Benefit and others, define the Properties – Characteristics – Abilities of an individual who is cooperative, a proficient Manager, a good Salesperson of someone who perceives and effectively handles situations and events. There exists a large volume of events as much through our daily life as through the formal sciences and technology, which confirms the above mentioned assertions and theories. Besides, the formal sciences for instance, concerning the social and philosophical conceptual field as well as the conceptual fields of formal sciences (Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, Informatics, and Technology) study relations and events that occur from these relations. The social and philosophical sciences study mostly the events concerning human relationships and the relation of humans to nature (ecology). Formal sciences study events regarding the relations of inorganic elements, inorganic and organic compounds up to the point that they explain various events about life and humans, regarding the relations of subatomic, inorganic elements, inorganic and organic compounds to the suns, the planets, the universe and humans. In the end, everything is about relations. But the formal sciences are those which have discovered in a greater manner the relation of the principles with the events – usually unconsciously – and by this manner evolve quicker (innovations, discoveries) in relation to the social and philosophical conceptual field; in the specific conceptual field of formal sciences, which study and propose alterations, mainly in human relations - amongst them being management, psychology and anything in general that promotes individual or collective relations with others and ourselves – does not exist, or exists completely unconsciously and in a very small degree, this mental order of flow of information from the Principles to the Rules-Values-Axioms and consequently to the Properties – Dexterities – Attributes. Knowledge, experiences and emotions dominate – or in the best case scenario – analysis and statics along with a perception of Principles as Ethics. As the consciousness, of all we have mentioned increases, as the information spontaneously and unconsciously move from the Principles towards the event, in every case and by increasingly more, the potentials of our Intelligence evolution will alter. As much as it may seem peculiar, as the consciousness increases, occur the inconscient (perception and action without emotion) and unconscious (perception, the making of decisions, their realization beyond the musts of conscious related to Ethics). Ιn general, whatever occurs as a result through Consciousness is related to a spontaneous action through some established and fixed information that is expressed as a life attitude. But that information is not perceived as Principles in their real meaning, the one we have mentioned above. It is not perceived as the effect of the constant and unchanged information in causing and developing events. Consciousness defines the constant and unchanged concerning information, its effect on matter and energy and transforms it into the Predetermined and irrevocable. At the same time, through the Principle of Combining the information that occurs from the constant and unchanged (Principles) becomes perceptible the inexhaustible new, reliable and essential information. The Predetermined through consciousness is not an obligation but an inconscient and unconscious compliance to Principles. Although we don’t realize it, we live in a world where things are regulated by Principles and not by our desires and targets. Events with stability and perspective are the result of Principles. Comprehending Principles leads to comprehending and causing events that are constant and have a perspective for evolution in each cognitive field. Non comprehension (consciousness - awareness) of Principles and of the flow of information from Principles to events – deviation from Principles – means that the desired event won’t be caused or if it will, it will have large energy requirements and it will be unstable. For example, if we desire when jumping up to remain steadily and constantly to a certain altitude such a thing won’t happen due to the Principle (Law) of Gravity which is equivalent to the Principle of Least Action. In order to remain above land surface we should understand the Principle of Gravity as well as a number of Rules – Axioms along with Abilities – Characteristics related to the motion of bodies, to the effects of air on motion and to the materials that we will use for the event to happen. The Union, combination and correlation of information coming from the Principles, shows us the unknown, the reliable and essential. Remaining above land surface is not a matter of desire but a matter of comprehension of Principles, Rules – Axioms and Abilities – Characteristics about flying. Moreover, remaining above land surface requires much more energy consumption than following the determined by the Principle of gravity. The same thing happens regarding the social field. By ignoring the Principles of Observation and Consciousness (Comprehension - Awareness) relationships and events caused through relationships will require more and more energy in order for them to happen, be maintained and developed. Eventually, through this increasing energy they will increase their instability and collapse. We should not consider even for a moment , due to ignorance or illusions imposed by our desires or doubt, that although Principles and Values – Axioms – Rules regulate the development of events in all universe, especially in the social cognitive field, in Human relationships, in Management they don’t exist, or even if they do, they work as Ethics. In every case Principles work as determinant information that regulates the stability and perspective of the events development. They are the basis for our Intelligence evolution. The comprehension of Principles and of the flow of information from Principles to events is the Intelligence Process itself and the Intelligence evolution. See Map of Principles, Values and Skills. Less

Our Intelligence Evolution in Practice

Our Intelligence evolution in practice and through each of our activities–at work, at our free time and interpersonal relations- is achieved since we start observing and comprehending the effects that the two factors below have in aspects of our everyday life:

The first factor is related to the emotion and also with what we call Identity/Personality, which, besides, includes the emotion.
The second factor is related to the Principles’ comprehension; to wit, the modes with which they act upon facts and circumstances and support the continuous improvement of the activity’s quality.

The Intelligence alteration occurs whether we deal with it or not. It happens in a manner similar to respiration, the cardiac action, and all other biological activities.

If we do not deal with the significance of Intelligence Process in our daily life, in practice and not in theory, we are unable to understand the time and the way this alteration becomes cognitive constitution, neither the time and the reason it becomes Mental distraction, disorder, multiplication of errors and problematic issues; we do not understand how the new, unknown and essential information, that supports the disregard of the problematic issues, and the effective opportunities management comes about in our life, neither what prevents its being perceived.

Learn More

Emotion and Identity/Personality

Every emotion is a comparison of what we experience in the present, based on criteria of the past.

The past has established what we consider to be pleasant or unpleasant, true or false, good or bad; a way of understanding through dipoles. In that way, the past determines the present, the action at this moment. Our life becomes an effort of repeating what we consider to be pleasant and acceptable and, at the same time, an effort of avoiding what we consider to be unpleasant and mistaken, having in mind their meaning as perceived in the past.

The emotion drives us to a continuous effort of repeating the past. Τhis is the reason why the emotion is absolutely unrelated to our Mental development. It acts by restricting the perception of the new and essential. In many cases, it is related to distraction, mental disorder and mind disruption.

We have no antithesis and we propose absolutely no reaction towards the emotion; we do not criticize it. Besides, reaction and criticism is a way of understanding through the emotion; a fact that limits the mind’s capability for development, as much relatively to the particular topic as in general. We just Observe and Understand, what the emotion causes and why and, while it intensifies, we discover the way it hinters our Mental development.

Intelligence evolution is the continuous understanding of the new -until recently unknown- reliable and substantial information. This information is combined and synchronized with previous knowledge and experience, determining the complement, the alteration or abolition of their validity. All this elaboration, which is called inspiration, foresight, vision or insight, creativity, innovation, etc., brings on valuable practical results.

Identity/Personality –which contains also our emotions- is a result of our knowledge and experiences no matter how they have been obtained, e.g. because of the chromosomes (heredity), through the behavior and education and through our own action as well (experiences). The Identity/Personality is the cause restricting our Intelligence process for the same reasons we mentioned above for the emotion.

The powerful Identity/Personality –where self-esteem appears to be expanded or rather powerful for essential and significant issues – hinters, suppresses and alters mind’s development. Self-esteem means certainty and no change, difficulty or weakness of understanding new important facts. The essential, though, has always unlimited abilities of exploration; it never is isolated and unabridged; it is always related to other equal or more important issues. The powerful Identity, even if it accepts new facts, restricts and changes them, because it understands the prior unknown and essential, always based on what it considers to be known and certain (absolutely valid).

Exactly the same –the restriction of our Intelligence evolution- is distinguished in the case of the weak personality. From the weak personality emerges the lack of orientation and the resignation, that soon appears through the emotions e.g. fear and stress, weakness and impatience, the sense of inferiority and desperation. Generally, the powerful and the weak, the good and bad, the positive and negative Personality’s aspects –the understanding of life through dipoles- restrict our Intelligence evolution as they determine repetition within the specified contexts (specifications) which sets the mind of each of us.

There is no value, then, to care for the strong or weak personality but for the continuous development of the personality based on Principles.

The relationship between the Perception of the Principles and our Intelligence evolution.

Our Intelligence evolution emerges from the perception of the relationship between the Principles and circumstances and facts; not as concepts, descriptions and schematics of mathematical formulas and symbols, but as the understanding of the effects and changes they cause on facts and circumstances. Various examples confirm all the above, in every cognitive field, without the exception of the social field, the interpersonal relations, the working environment and the general environments of collective action.

All the new –prior unknown- reliable[1] and significant[2] information, the innovative and essential developments in every field, the continuous improvement of action’s quality emerge from this elaboration of mind. This specific elaboration has nothing to do with the Identity/Personality, but with the continuous alteration, denaturation and meta-development of the Personality and not her strengthening and verification.

The Principles (what underlies to the Law) –what always applies steadily and invariably in time-, their understanding and union, the combination and correlation of the information that emerges from them –from their effect on facts and circumstances - are the basis and the source of our Intelligence evolution.

The basic Principles are common for every cognitive field. In some cases they have the same name –despite the cognitive field-, while in others we give them various names whilst they cause the same results. There are Principles valid all around the universe, from its creation and in every field of development, e.g. subatomic, atomic (chemical elements), molecular (inorganic and organic compounds), biologic (living beings) and social (relationships).

For example there is no objection that the basic Principles below are valid:

a) “The Principle of Continuous Alteration”; everything changes into anything related to the matter and energy and consequently into anything consisted from them

b) “The Principle of Least Action”[3] which in social level becomes understandable as the improvement of productivity, the decrease of energy consumption in order for the same piece of work to be produced, and also as the complicity between people and consequently as conflict aversion.

However, in our effort to understand and handle facts and circumstances in the social field, we insist on systematically solidifying both Principles above. Desire forces us struggling to retain stable, facts and circumstances that we consider to be pleasant, opposing to the Principle of Continuous Change. On the contrary, we should have posed as our priority the Observation and Understanding of the effect the Principles have on the changes, instead of the desire that generally prevails. As soon as the desire deviates from the Principles, it creates unstable facts which demand more and more energy for their maintenance –just to exist- without any potentiality for further development.

Furthermore, in many cases, when we struggle to defend our own interests or willing, expectations and interests of a group, we are not interested in the improvement of our productivity, the continuous effort for the decrease of energy consumption, the complicity and avoidance of conflicts; then we consider that the Principle of Least Action does not exist, having as a result to deal constantly in our life with the effects of this deviation.

Deviation from Principles, for example from the Principle of Least Action that we have mentioned, does not mean failure as we define it, with the meaning of non-achievement of targets, of those set by entrepreneurs, executives or generally by people who act. It means increased energy for target achievement. When desire dominates and the target concentrates all of our attention because of the desire, then in many cases the target is achieved. Gradually, over time, due to this opinion – desire and action equal increase in the possibility of target achievement – personality emerges as the dominant factor for developments. It is then that Observation and Consciousness based on Principles are replaced by the repetition of the beliefs of Personality. Apparently repetition due to success is not absolute or general but occurs when Personality acquires all the more highest confidence in the way of achieving results.

Furthermore, the application of one Principle or another separately and occasionally is not the issue, but the perception of the way that the of the basic Principles as a whole affect events, situations and developments.

Every deviation from the Principles means energy (effort) accumulation, pointless consumption of more and more energy, instability of a fact or of a succession of facts and, at the end, collapse. On the contrary, action compatible with the Principles means improvement of the possibilities of attracting the facts and of their improvement perspectives.

The above mentioned are rather useful when they become understandable in practice, and particularly in aspects of our everyday life.

The outcomes from the in practice understanding of Intelligence evolution in Enterprises, Institutions and working environments and environments of collective action in general, arise from the reliable perception of the changes -problematic issues and chances- the continuous development of the action. We are able to discern mainly via the essential improvement of the results of crucial elaborations (e.g. Meetings, Management and Business Plan, Research and Development, Marketing, Client and Suppliers’ Management, and others depending on each enterprise’s activities.

[1] The substantial in events and situations level is subjective and with great extent. It would be insane to try to restrict it within the framework of one’s desire. Additionally, it is always connected with various facts (events and situations) equally or even more substantial. Actually, the substantial exists within the Principles’ relationship with events and situations that one finds important and not within the events themselves; it exists in the information emerging from this relationship. Thence emerges the content, the development of mind, the continuous improvement of action quality, and not from the definition of what is substantial within the events and situation level.

[2] The reliable is not related to emotional tensions and volatilities; it does not create expectations and desires. At the same time, it makes understandable and spontaneously (easily) usable various situations and events, by making visible their normality, the manner and conditions of their repeat, the interactions and developments they cause; all those facts that were previously not perceivable or their perception caused emotional effects due to obscurity and misunderstandings. It emerges from the –mainly spontaneous- perception of the events’ relationship with the Principles that destroy obscurity, while induces ease and clarity in mind.

[3] The Principle of Least Action: When a number of changes are taking place in nature, the quantity ACTION (Energy [times two] Time) necessary for those changes is always the least possible. The Principle was presented for the first time in 1744. Later, during different time periods, even in mid-20th century, the Principle was re-theorised for various reasons each time. Many years later, in the 20th century, it will be proved valuable in cognitive fields, like the General Theory of Relativity, quantum field theory and particle physics. The Principle of Least Action will offer to the physicists an alternative phrasing of classic Mechanics, independent in the beginning from the Newton’s laws, but later related to the 2nd Newton’s Law (Richard Feyman, 1942).

. Less

Intelligence Evolution and Education.

To whom they Run Education, plan its development and serve it by teaching in every level and manner.

Intelligence Development and the Needs for Changes in Educational Process

Intelligence Development is consisted of three individual functions:

Information: Collection, arrangement, recall and use of uncut Information from memory or the means of information storage e.g. books, magnetic means (CD, DVD, hard disks), internet.
Relativity: Ways of Interpreting Information; evaluation and Information Selection; Interpretations from information combination. An information series obtains meaning and such a perspective that information can support the production of new, previously unknown, and reliable information as well as the challenge or justification of an event or a sequence of events. Events and situations –developments in general- are related to energy and matter alterations, to a creation that is impossible to be perceived through senses.
Timing: Arrival, Modulation and Synchronicity of new, previously unknown Information. Pattern, Information Contemporaneity. Some call it Coincidence and Luck and it has as a result the appearance of an event or a sequence of events that cannot be justified. That means that the events are placed in space and time as energy and matter alteration, as creation that can be perceived through senses, without our being able to understand how and why; something mysterious incurs that may be desirable, undesirable or neutral, a development that we usually ascribe it to luck, coincidence.

The entire above individual functions takes place simultaneously.

Learn More

For centuries there is an intense orientation to the first function. The other two (Relativity and Timing) are barely being perceived up to now and offer their results usually spontaneous, unconsciously.

Some years before, the first individual function of mind, the one related to memory and memorization, was of the greater value. Anyone having in his command valid information and recalled them in his memory was a rather valuable person. Nowadays, information and the internet have put and will put all the more-through time- in second and third place and value the specific ability, the “charisma” of memorization.

Some time ago we have turned to criticism. Regardless our increased interest for criticism (Relevance of Information) and not for memory and memorization, this interest is mainly theoretical. We have not defined the main reasons developing or suppressing criticism. We are incapable to suggest simple and effective ways for its development. We act in an exercises’ level, through which we believe that we will develop criticism; we mention indicatively the term “evidential experience” and other relevant definitions. We do not understand the ways with which previous information and the Identity/Personality are capable to prevent criticism development. For the most of us, criticism means comparison with the known; distortion/misuse and restriction of the new, based on (because of) our knowledge and experiences.

The third individual Intelligence Function (Information Timing) is even less understandable in practice. Most of us call it coincidence or luck. That happens because we consider our Intelligence function to be something isolated in one’s brain, evidence that indicates a great delusion. We and our brain are results of the Intelligence function, the effect of the Principles on mater and energy.

We all accept very easily that we constitute a small part of the loose environment, the fact that we exist thanks to it. Nevertheless, our intelligence function remains a personal or, at best a joint human case and not a thing that connects us with the developments from which we come from, the loose environment thanks to which we exist.

The restraint of Intellectual function within the human framework, the effort of its being perceived as a brain and nervous system function –along with the anthropocentric authentication- restrict the perception and, consequently, the practical results that could occur. The issues that arise -personal, joint, and environmental –result from the specific way the mind works. We do not understand our Intellectual function as being included in the way we perceive our relation with the environment but as a means of superiority.

Considering the facts up to now, we believe that the need for changing our attention becomes visible, not only within the educational system but within every area of understanding and action; within our working environment and of joint action in general, family, social relations, anywhere.

To the extent that we understand the main reasons of the current situation -the reason why we perceive our Intelligence evolution with such a restricted manner- we have the abilities to create the exceedance conditions.

Additionally, since we broaden our perception for the Intellectual Function basics in a simple way -in events and situations of our daily life - then, we proceed from standards and restrictions imposed by them to other paces of Intelligence Evolution and action quality’s improvement.

The Proposal that Improves the Pace of our Intelligence Development.

Most of our knowledge and experience obtained -during thousands of years of our existence on earth- have mainly to do with a system of understanding through senses and emotions. This way of understanding prevails in the social field mainly, within anything related to relationships between us and the environment, at employment and joint action in general, in education and anything else related to the social field, such as politics, religions, various social and philosophical theories. Any corrections of issues arising afterwards, due to this particular way of understanding, have to do with the capability of understanding of information related to the Principles’ effect on events and situations.

An example: For thousands of years the earth was flat and the center of the world, since people understood reality through senses and the anthropocentric theory (emotion) related to the especial relationship of God with Human. There was a great difficulty for human to understand that the earth is round (elliptical) and it swings around the sun as part of a planet system. Many years passed and there were many reactions since Galileo and Copernicus expressed a different opinion than that our senses understood and our emotions desired. The invention of the fallacy had to do with information related to the effect of the Principle of Gravity and Attraction. It is possible that the relevant Newton’s Law had not been expressed since then, but its effects were understandable in various ways.

Consequently, we are not concerned about the theoretical knowledge of the Principles (Laws) and Regulations/Values/Axioms, but about the effects they have on matter and energy that become understandable through various ways; in many cases even before the expression of the Principles or the correlation of events with them. Furthermore, in many of those cases gaps of intelligence are preceding and afterwards, the Principles or the relationship of events with them become perceptible.

For example, what became first perceptible was the paradox (gap of intelligence) related to the constant velocity of light in any means, in relation to those known about acceleration and retardation from Newton's Laws (Principles). Afterwards, based on that gap of intelligence, Einstein discovered the Principles for the unbreakable relation between matter and energy, as well as for energy transfer, by expressing the general and specific theory of relativity. We could mention too many examples of joint fallacy or joint ignorance, some of them more important than the one above, related to the great existing fallacy that the earth is flat. We are referred to this example as it is known and more understandable from the majority.

When the comprehension of events is done through their observation based on knowledge, experiences and emotions – first shape on the top left, which concerns the usual manner of comprehension – Intelligence evolution is restrained and in time there is a loss of clarity and order of the Mind, Intelligence Imbalance.

When we focus on the understanding of the Principles, the events are in the background; they do not dominate our life as targets, plans and desires. The flow of information moves from the Principles to the Rules and based on it we define the Qualities and Characteristics of events – second shape bottom right – something that while is self-evident, seldom occurs. The specific flow of information constitutes the path to limitless Intelligence, to the definition of the new, unidentified and substantial information in every cognitive field.

Science and Technology perceive the information flow from the Principles to the Rules – Axioms as self-evident, based on it they perceive qualities and characteristics and provoke events, which were unidentified or inexistent before (inventions – innovations). In these cognitive fields, decisions are never made based on the consideration that “Knowledge, experiences and emotions are telling me to act in a certain manner”, but are absolutely convinced that “If I intend to define the perspective, in order for a substantial event to occur, of an event I am able to provoke and evolve, then I must be able to discover the flow of information from the Principles to the Rules – Axioms and consequently define qualities and characteristics and, thus observe the truth and perspective of the event".

Of course, the self-evident does not take place in the social cognitive field, in Management, in our relations with others and with our self. The reason why the self-evident does not take place is clear. The EGO - Identity, knowledge and experiences, which become a certainty in our mind – along with various hidden or apparent emotions – do not allow the self-evident to take place.

We give a simple example of the obvious thing that does not occur, something that happens in a vast range. We all effortlessly agree and spontaneously admit that there is the Principle of Continuous Change (everything made of matter and energy changes) and that changes with perspective are determined by Principles. However, when it comes to things that we like and desire, we wish that everything stays as it is or changes depending on our desires; even concerning the numerable different desires that each one has. We mostly desire in order for us to provoke changes, instead of putting as a first priority the Observation and Comprehension based upon Principles.

It is incredibly challenging to comprehend in practice all those simple things. It is really weird and strange how simple and how difficult at the same time seems to be the way to our Intelligence evolution.

The two neglected and to a great extend unexplained individual Intelligence Functions (Relativity and Information Timing), that are the most valuable, could be developed, when the specific need for information flow inversion becomes perceptible.

What remains is that the above becomes widely comprehensible, within ways related to our daily life. This fact has huge dimensions. It cannot be relied on rules and recipes of success. It is a way of life related to the continuous exploration of practical results of the suggested inversion of information flow.

We are at your disposal for a joint course to that direction.

Less

The Real Revolution

Those that exist and continue to exist in spite of our will –in spite of our desire that we call logic– appear and are maintained by real causes. For example, in nature –for facts concerning the biological field and natural phenomena– those that exist and continue to exist are not related to our desire that we call logic. The same applies in the social field; a large number of people understand the need to have different situations and manage actions, so that they continue to exist, contrary to the view of others as to how purposeful and useful their existence is.
Consequently, every reaction of ours, whatever it may be, will not eliminate anything that exists. Political and economic systems, religions, various approaches and traditions, living beings, natural disasters, various facts and situations that we consider unreasonable and undesirable, because we do not like them, they have real reasons to exist. Everything coming from the past, still operating today, fulfills needs having factual reasons to exist, regardless of our desire that we call logic.

Learn More

Those that no longer exist despite our will, despite our desire to continue to exist –which we usually perceive and call logic– have ceased to exist due to real causes; in particular, owing to the way that nature affects them disrupting their existence. We are all aware that this is observed in events concerning the biological field and natural phenomena. The same applies in the social field. Established structures in the social field disappear regardless of our desire that we call logic. For example, we all know that over time living beings, political systems, religions, social structures and traditions, were lost despite the desire of some – few or many– to continue to exist. Admittedly, the same is also observed with everything new that appears and spreads, despite our desire not to appear and not to being circulated. Again we find ways to name this specific desire logic.
It should be emphasized that, in many cases, what we perceive as new is nothing but facts or results that completely escaped our attention or for which there was a completely different approach that prevented the distinction of their perspective, the perception of their relationship and synergy with other, known, facts which are deemed important. The way we approach and interpret various facts and situations determines the extent of perception and the amplitude of practical effects. The understanding of the relationship of the Principles with facts and situations offers the best perspective in the process of interpretation.
All of the above claims are historically proven. The Islam did not abolish Christianity, communism and socialism did not abolish capitalism, free market did not eliminate state intervention. What has been abolished in the social field and no longer exists, in essence has evolved into something else. Its evolution, however, is such that we presently do not recognize that elements of the old and extinct continue to exist. In fact, some of these old elements are and can be determined through something else, which is existent and alive. Furthermore, it is well known –it has been repeated too many times historically– the fact that individuals and groups that have a revolutionary drive for radical changes through desire, emotion and expediency, end up creating at best a new status quo.
Based on the above, a real rebel is not one who fights with words and actions against those that already exist, because he thinks of them as unreasonable; one who’s trying to disrupt their presence and who’s battling to eliminate the tradition which now seems useless. The real rebel is not interested in abolishing, altering radically, what he does not like or creating the products of his own desire, which he calls logical, absolutely necessary, ideological, miraculous, such that will change the world. Moreover, it is self-evident that he is not acting based on logic –knowledge and experiences that have proven their validity in the past– or through tradition. The real rebel is neither related to desire –emotional perception– nor to logic.
The real rebel is one who constantly perceives in practice –through the events of his everyday life– the root causes that lead to cognitive disorder, to the disarray of mind, the one who perceives the impact of emotion, desire and Identity; in particular, the ways they lead him to repetition, to the incapacity to perceive what’s new and substantial and to the continuous decline of the quality of action.
The real rebel is one that has perceived in practice –through events of his everyday life– how the order of the mind occurs, as well as the Intelligence evolution and the continuous improvement of the quality of action; the one who practically understands that the new –up until now unknown– reliable and substantial information emerges only through the understanding of the relationship of the basic Principles with facts and situations. He is the one who perceives day to day and in practice that senses and emotions create limitations, whose transcendence occurs through the perception of the effect of basic Principles to events and situations.
Therefore, he is able to support the best possible picture for what actually exists, forming a relationship with it that sets him free. He manages to observe and constantly comprehend the existent and to relate to it, without exhausting himself in conflict and unnecessary loss of energy; he refrains from emotional surges and fluctuations arising due to perceptions and beliefs he has so far crystalized about the existent. He is always distinguished for the clear mind that guides him to live in correlation –to be in a creative relationship– with the existent; a relationship which is not compromise and habit, necessity or ideology of dream and fantasy. It is a relationship of understanding of the existent and an ongoing contribution on the essential causes that determine the continuity of its existence; it is the unceasing inquiry and further development of the relationship between a lucid, coherent and at the same time rebellious mind and the existent, which means understanding and care for the development of the perspective of that which exists and concern for the continuous improvement of action.
Thus, that which is existent will continue to exist and evolve, though, to the extent of the perception that its evolution depends on the understanding of the new and substantial, and on the information and the action that are constantly evolving the substantial causes of its existence. On the other hand it will wane or cease to exist as it deviates from the perception of the substance; as it is disassociated from the perception of the reliable and substantial which is not static; as it develops exclusive or dominant relationship with tradition, habit and repetition. What exists will either revolutionize for itself every day, every hour, every moment, or it will wane and abolish itself.
The real rebel does not organize a revolution against a situation, to save some people, on behalf of others, or against what he thinks of as the status quo. The real revolution is only about the capability for one to broaden his perceptual capacity, quality of mind and to constantly improve the quality of action. This cannot happen through conflict, division, enforcement. Real Revolution is the continuous constitution of the mind which has nothing whatsoever to do with the overall questioning of the already existent and the conflict with it. Reaction and conflict is the way of expediency and emotion.
The Principle of Continuous Alteration in conjunction with the Principle of Least Action, which in the social field means synergy and conflict avoidance –Principles that exist since the creation of the universe, or rather Principles that created and evolve the universe– support the above claims about real revolution.
Political and economic systems, religious and social organizations, structures of every form, individuals and groups are called upon to constantly comprehend the new and substantial which is inexhaustible. The basic Principles of Continuous Alteration and Least Action prove to us, for about fourteen billion years –since the creation of the universe until today–, that the substantial developments occur endlessly without taking into account our desire.
What I believe and what you believe are seeking together the improvement, when they have actually understood the basic Principles of Continuous Alteration and Least Action, those that we in the social realm call Love for Creation, Observation, Consciousness and Continuous Improvement. Then our beliefs are not the dominant center of attention, but how the way we observe, understand and act will get in practice more and more efficient, as the years go by.
Revolution has been identified with action and especially with reaction. Real revolution, however, relates to constant understanding of the perspective and the limits of the established way of perceiving and acting. This means that real revolution exists always into the substantial, into the perception of developments that never end, into the continuous perception of the relationship of basic Principles to facts and situations, since it is an inexhaustible process. Undoubtedly, it is not possible for it to be entrenched in outlooks of the past, whatever –even it is considered highly authoritative– their origin is.
Less

SERVICES

Our books

Intelligence Process